Air Cargo Screening: Risk-based Vs. One Size Fits All

May 19, 2015
Doug Brittin, Secretary-General of the International Cargo Association (TIACA) explains why a risk-based approach to cargo screening is preferable to the one-size-fits all method.

Air cargo is not immune to potential terrorist actions. Terrorists can use cargo to get explosives aboard aircraft, as in the case when two explosive packages were discovered in an ink cartridge on an aircraft bound for the United States from Yemen. In 2007, Congress passed the “Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act,” more commonly known as the 9/11 Act.  This law requires that all cargo transported on passenger aircraft be screened for explosives, as of August 1, 2010. U.S. law requires that every piece of cargo carried on a passenger aircraft in and out of the US is screened in a prescribed way.  The same screening is used for air cargo as for passenger luggage. 

Two approaches are currently being used for air cargo screening in the United States – a risk based approach and a one-size-fits-all method.

 Homeland Security Today asked Doug Brittin, Secretary-General of the International Cargo Association (TIACA) to explain why a risk-based approach to cargo screening is preferable to the one-size-fits all method.

Read more of what Brittin had to say here: http://www.hstoday.us/columns/borders-intel/blog/air-cargo-screening-risk-based-vs-one-size-fits-all/008dce4ccf3b38fdb12af63b838989b1.html